wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /srv/users/sandra/apps/sandra/public/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Looking for an AI tool that will save you time? My QuickWrite review will help you decide if this author-specific resource is what you need.<\/em><\/pre>\nAffiliate Disclosure:<\/strong> This post contains affiliate links, which means if you click on them and make a purchase, I will receive a small commission (at no extra charge to you). <\/em><\/p>\n
You\u2019ve probably heard lots of chatter about artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools recently. ChatGPT from OpenAI is getting the most attention, and not all of it is good.<\/p>\n
Users have documented problems that include capacity issues (you can\u2019t always use it when you need to) and inaccurate information<\/a>. Inaccuracy isn\u2019t unique to this resource, though \u2013 it\u2019s something to watch out for with all AI tools.<\/p>\n
People are also concerned about bias picked up from information fed into the system and copyright issues.<\/p>\n
QuickWrite and copyright<\/h2>\n
As a writer, I worry about copyright violations, too. So, before I started using and recommending QuickWrite<\/a>,<\/strong> an AI tool created specifically for authors, I asked C.J. McDaniel, the tool\u2019s creator, about copyright and plagiarism issues.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s what he told me:<\/p>\n
\u201cFirst, the content being generated is original, and the algorithms & AI do not copy information. They generate responses to your queries. Our AI engine has been trained on billions of words of content to give it its wealth of context and knowledge and to train it in how humans communicate. So the information you receive back will be original to you; even if someone else gave it the exact same information, they would still get different results.<\/em><\/p>\n
\u201cBut taking that a step further, some of the things you can do to make sure that someone else doesn’t have the same content are the things that I believe we authors already naturally do. This includes things like making sure we give it original commands and then do edits or add expertise, knowledge, or creativity to further flesh out what is given.<\/em><\/p>\n
\u201cQuickWrite comes up super clean on all the plagiarism checkers we have tested and anything we have seen is always common phrases that authors would use anyway. On our plagiarism checks, we haven\u2019t seen anything come even close to that 25% duplicate content that Google uses as its standard for duplicate content.”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
My QuickWrite review starts with firsthand experience<\/h2>\n
With my copyright question out of the way, I first used QuickWrite<\/a> to help me write a blog post on how to use YouTube for book marketing<\/a>. Here\u2019s the process I followed:<\/p>\n
\n
- I asked it to generate book marketing blog post topics.<\/li>\n
- After making a selection, I asked it to outline the article.<\/li>\n
- I then asked it to write each section of the outline, one section at a time (because that\u2019s how the tool works).<\/li>\n
- As I worked, I copied and pasted each section into the text editing box until I had an AI-generated draft.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
It would have taken me several hours to write that draft. QuickWrite produced it in about 15 minutes.<\/p>\n
I spent time removing repetitious content, editing the text so it was more my style and less generic, and adding my stories and anecdotes.<\/p>\n
But wow \u2013 this was a timesaver! That’s just one reason I wanted to write this QuickWrite review for you.<\/p>\n
QuickWrite is a writer\u2019s assistant<\/h2>\n